div>The book, Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer, to me was a great example of an author who had experienced similar things to the person being written about. The book was written to inform everyone that Chris is not a idiot, lunatic, or schizophrenia, but a person who did something that he desired to do, no matter what the consequences. Most people will not risk their lives to do what they desire, but Chris did not want to act like an ordinary person. I thought Krakauer had the right impression of Chris because he experienced similar things and he sees him with different eyes compared to the many critics who dislike him and do not acknowledge him. The subject matter was very interesting, even tough I usually tend to not read non-fiction books. Although, I would have really enjoyed the book if he put more information about Chris' travels, but he probably had only so much information he could work with. I do recommend reading this book, because Krakaur's use of words really brings the book together. The overall life of Chris McCandless or "Alex Supertramp" is so interesting by itself, reading it is a must! The downside is that the book does not go in the right time order, so it may be hard to follow. Do not fret! This book will make sense sooner or later (maybe a lot later). The book tells us that life is about pursuit of independent happiness, but not in the materialistic way. Chris is trying to reach the point in which nothing can satisfy him more knowing he achieved happiness on his own. Quotes from Krakauer and Chris McCandless confirms the theme. A quote from the journal of Chris McCandless, “I have lived through much, and I think I have found what is needed for happiness”. In this quote, Chris is telling us that he has achieved the point in his life in which he is satisfied by going into the wild. To me, it seems that this idea of starting a new life was based on achieving his idea of happiness.





At first, you would think Chris was a unintelligent kid who read too many novels by Jack London, but as you look into his past, he is like a normal young man you would see o a daily basis. But there is one difference, that he would go outside the "normal" and "ordinary" lifestyle to achieve what Chris would call "true happiness". He was a pretty normal child. He did numerous sports, played a musical instrument, and really loved running. The intriguing thing I learned about him was that he hated to listen to instruction or go the extra "ten- percent". He was so great at these things, but he would refuse to listen, even if it was going to help him. As a person, Chris' mind was not ordinary because he thought in ways most people couldn't even comprehend. He was not "nuts" or did not have mental disorders; he just had a different mindset in life. I would actually prefer to talk to him more than an ordinary person. Even Wayne Westerberg's mother, who disliked most of his hired help, adored and enjoyed Chris's presence. She stated that "Unlike most of us,he was the sort of person who insisted on living out his beliefs." and she also talked about how he acted older than twenty, how much he loved books, and how much he liked to ask questions. I disagree and agree with the negative critics of Chris McCandless because, he was unprepared for the harshness of Alaska and did underestimate the land, but he was no lunatic and did not have any mental disorders. These critics, most of which are actually from Alaska, have heard so many stories about young men going into the wilderness and dying. They most likely are tired of hearing these stories and always believe that they are idiots and should not be praised. I believe these critics need to look at his past and personality before making harsh and mean judgments. Chris is a different case than other people who died while traveling in Alaska's wilderness because he was trying to find true happiness which was not at his home. He was not trying to discover, research or study the wilderness. To him, the wilderness was freedom and satisfaction. I think Chris was an amazing person and should be praised rather than criticized in a negative way. We all can learn from him that we all need to find our true happiness and go above and beyond in our lives.





"Happiness is best when shared with everyone"
Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth.

"Long live the Supertramp."




Jon Krakauer's, Into The Wild movie adaption definitely has major differences when compared to his outstanding book. A major difference is how the film does not follow Chris' life in a normal order( the book doesn't follow by his life at all). An example of this would be that the first plot is about Chris in Alaska, next he has a flashback, then it shows the months just before his stay in Alaska, then another flashback, and finally his death. Another difference is how the movie includes many scenes of Chris by himself and the movie relied on Chris' journals,but the book uses information from people who met Chris on his journey. For instance, one scene shows McCandless singing and celebrating in what he refers to in his journal as the “magic bus,”.
A change in the movie was Chris' relationship with Tracy. In the book, she was only mentioned in a few sentences, but in the movie their relationship between each other was amplified. Jon Krakauer was not included in the movie, because it was based on Chris' life, not after. Also, instead of Krakauer narrating, Chris' sister, Carine, was the narrator.
The film improved the book by making it clear to us the frustration and anger Chris was going through (especially the moose catastrophe). The film gave us the ability to see him in anguish after he cannot find any animals to eat(with a lot of cursing added to the mix). The book did not include much on his emotions during the worst times in Alaska, which was not very helpful.
The book is superior because it gives the true facts and does not over exaggerate anything. Also the book explains why Chris was not an idiot and was not like all of the other "explorers" who have perished. You get views from people who have done similar things, especially Krakauer (he can really relate to him). Also, the book is like a biography, so you get to know more about him than in a movie. Krakauer made the book intriguing because many pages had opinions and information that makes you stop and ponder on what he wrote and the opinions of others to decide what side you are on.


I would not put my eight items on a belt, but on a canvas. This canvas will have things on it that represent my unique self, because there is no such thing as an identical painting. On my canvas,I would put a portrait of myself, because I want people to know me a unique person and that I am beautiful the way I am. If you think otherwise, I could really care less, because being unique is better than fitting in. I would also have a head of a lioness on my canvas to represent my personality because a lioness is nice and caring to her pride members, but is short-tempered, and ferocious towards prey, unwelcome lions, and annoying males. This basically describes my personality in a nutshell,and I want people to know what I am like as a person, and not just m outside appearance. On my canvas, I would place a picture of Ireland on it because it is where my family comes from, and being completely Irish makes it feel more like home. It is a beautiful place, and I enjoyed all of the time I have spent there.It is important to me because it is where all of my ancestors came from, and without them, I would not be here today and I want people to know that this is by far my favorite destination to travel to. My fourth thing I would put on my canvas would be a picture of Ghirardelli Dark Chocolate.Why? Well, because chocolate is a woman's best friend of course! You could give me money,and I'll thank you, but if you get me Ghirardelli Chocolate, You'll be hugged and thanked for a month. Dark chocolate brings out my sweeter personality,and I want people to know that I, a short-tempered and stubborn woman have a sweet side.



I would also have a picture of an iris on my canvas, because they are not only my favorite flower, but they have inspired me to continue my artwork. I have a love for flowers and I enjoy looking at new ones I have not seen before, and I especially enjoy going to endless meadows of flowers, which I why I love to travel. My sixth item I would have on my canvas, is a picture of a 1920's flapper because they are going above and beyond the normal dress, going above the law, and starting a whole new era of fashion. Of course I don' break the law, but I like to do things my way and do things other people wouldn't normally dare to do. I do not like to follow trends that ordinary people do. I like to be unique! Without this inspiration, I would be nothing and that is not acceptable.
My seventh item on my canvas would be the initials A.D.S, which stand for Agnes Diane Skrutch because she is a major inspiration to continue my art. Although I did not know my Grandmother that long (because she passed away when I was 6), she used to tell me that if I truly loved to do something, to never quit no matter what people say. She was an artist herself in her younger days, and even though she had three children and not a alot of money, she continued to paint, and that is why I respect her so much. My eighth item would be a picture of Alaska, because it it isolated and sparcly populated,and shows earth's true beauty. I've been to Alaska twice and it is a great experience. I sometimes like to be isolated from others and ponder on my thoughts,without the gossip and nosy voices of others. Getting way for a little bit really lifts alot of stress from my mind. Alaska is like my personality and outer-self; Quiet, but beautiful. These eight things basically describe who I am, what I have gained, and what I have learned.

*Portrait in the middle was drawn by myself.

Direct Characterization

1. "he was congenial and seemed well educated" (5) - He was a nice person and was quite smart.

2. "McCandless was smallish with the hard, stringy physique of an itinerant laborer" (16) - He had a fit body that naturally came with the work of a laborer.

3. "hungry to learn" (67) Alex has a desire to learn new things

4 "Determined. Real gung ho" (6) He was exited and upbeat at starting his journey.

5."master of his own destiny" (23) He would not let anyone but himself to decide his fate

Indirect Characterization.

1. "Didn't matter what it was, he'd do it:hard physical labor, mucking rotten grain and dead rats out of the bottom of the hole" (18) - Alex "Chris" was such a loyal and hard worker, that he would do anything to get it done. He was dedicated to whatever work he recieved.

2. "He always had to know the absolute right answer before he could go on to the next thing."(18) - Chris is eager to know all that he could, and is hungry for knowledge.

3.Alex refuses help (including supplies) from Westerburg or Jan Burres(68) - Alex is independent, likes to do things himself

4. Ronald Franz enjoyed spending his time with Chris "Alex" (50) - Alex is very personable and people ejoy his company.

5. Alex sneaks into Mexico (32) - Alex does not care what the government says and likes to do things as he pleases.


Summary
In Jon Krakauer's Into The Wild, Chris McCandless is a knowledgeable and pleasant young man, but unfortunately lacks common sense. He seeks adventure, and is quite cold to strangers, but if you get to know him, you see a young man that is quite outgoing and personable. He is noted to have quite a large smile. Alex does not like have his destiny determined by others, and doesn't want to walk the same path everyone else does. Because of this, he defies the laws by going to Mexico illegally, and killing animals without a license. His lack of common sense seems to be his downfall because when you are going on such a large trip, you need to be well stocked up on provisions, equipment etc. and he was not. He loves to talk with others, and once you get him talking with someone with the same interests as himself, he'll never stop talking. He has a very mixed disposition; he can be quiet, outgoing, and quite mysterious.


To me, the word nature has the association with peace and tranquility. I find it quite interesting how nature can bring smiles, and also bring sorrow and despair. The natural world impacts my life by giving me the inspiration to make new paintings. Nature is full of a dazzling array of colours, and there is always something new and fascinating to discover, which create new things for me to paint. Also, nature gives me the motivation to spend more time outside, because I enjoy looking at the beautiful scenery while riding my bike.

One great experience I had was when my family and I went to Ireland for vacation. We would go out of town and into lush meadows, full of flowers, tall grass, and the lovely sounds of animals. It was quite enjoyable because when you are alone with nature, you do not hear the annoying sounds of cars, people, and factories. This is the best experience I've had with nature, and I hope to experience it again. Although, anything that has to do with nature, because it is a huge stress reliever! Bike riding on a trail, walking in a park, and just exploring new territory outside is fun or me. I especially enjoy when riding a bike on a hot summer day while going down huge hills. If you hold your head up high, you feel a wonderful rush of air. Sometimes it feels as if I am getting high off of it.


A bad experience I had in nature was in 2008, during a biking trip in Virginia. It was pouring down rain, but my Dad still forced us to keep going. Unfortunately for him, he did not know rain and I do not like each other so much. I went a little too fast and could not control my bike on the mud. I skidded across the wet mud for over 20 feet or so, and after hitting my front brakes a lot of times a catastrophe happened. I did a front flip right into a tree (one of which I was allergic to) and broke my nose.